From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julian Gomez Subject: Re: Performance losings with iptables Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:09:26 +0800 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030520100926.GA1209@floyd> References: <007d01c31965$fe099ce0$3a51a8c0@memmingen> <1053417001.1964.86.camel@kermit.spenneberg.de> Reply-To: kluivert@tm.net.my Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1053417001.1964.86.camel@kermit.spenneberg.de> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Netfilter On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 09:50:01AM +0200, Ralf Spenneberg spoke thusly: >Am Die, 2003-05-13 um 17.40 schrieb Michael Albrecht: >> iptables -A input -s 192.168.81.xxx >> i will lose a lot of perfomance (for >> example: apache take a lot of time, ssh ...) Wenn i show the perfomance >> with vmstat - vmstat says that 99 % is As Michael has already mentioned, I too doubt its an iptables fault. I've had in excess of 1,300 rules running on a production firewall, for dynamic dumping of Nimda infected hosts. Its almost certainly a name resolving issue as Michael has already pointed to.