From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.72]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D92482C for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 20:08:11 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 22:09:08 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Joel Soete Cc: Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4 and semtimedop - need kernel compat? Message-ID: <20030521020908.GE10485@systemhalted> References: <3EC76210000009D0@ocpmta8.freegates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3EC76210000009D0@ocpmta8.freegates.net> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > In the very last Andrea's patch 2.4.21rc2aa1.bz2, I read that Andrea already > back port this stuff :) > > At a first glance, the job is also applied for hppa. Would you like that > I have a look to see if it is applicable with your patch in p-l cvs tree? Seeing as how our glibc 2.3.2 is highly unstable and non-functional, it won't help very much :( It should be easy enough to connect our syscall to semtimedop when the code is backported. c.