From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262037AbTEUINT (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2003 04:13:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262034AbTEUINL (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2003 04:13:11 -0400 Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.27]:15236 "EHLO mwinf0403.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262033AbTEUILi (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2003 04:11:38 -0400 From: Duncan Sands To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] USB speedtouch update Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:24:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200305210049.24619.baldrick@wanadoo.fr> <20030521020732.GA7939@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20030521020732.GA7939@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305211024.38553.baldrick@wanadoo.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I've applied all of these to my tree, but I didn't apply the following > to Linus's tree because they just didn't apply. I tried to fix up a few > by hand, and got some of them to work, but eventually gave up on the > rest. So here's a list of the ones that didn't go into Linus's tree: > USB speedtouch: use optimally sized reconstruction buffers > USB speedtouch: send path micro optimizations > USB speedtouch: kfree_skb -> dev_kfree_skb > USB speedtouch: receive code rewrite > > Also this one didn't go into Linus's tree, as it's already there: > USB speedtouch: remove MOD_XXX_USE_COUNT > > So, any patches against Linus's latest bk tree to bring the above into > sync would be appreciated. I think the problem is that you forgot to apply this one to Linus's tree: [PATCH 02/14] USB speedtouch: trivial whitespace and name changes Ciao, Duncan.