From: Nathan <smurf@osdl.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mark Peloquin <peloquin@austin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Nightly regression runs against current bk tree
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:03:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030529220343.GL25252@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73smqx791m.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:11:17PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> It would be nice if we had a new linux-testresults list where such
> updates could be posted regularly. I don't think it belong on l-k
> because it would be too noisy. Perhaps such a list could be added to
> vger. David, what do you think?
The OSDL has a serious amount of automated testing we could point the
results of to a separate list if it is created.
Right now we avoid pointing that sort of thing to l-k because it would
drive people nuts. On average we complete 40+ tests a day.
With all the testing efforts going on, a central list to post and
analyze results would be good. People interested in helping out could
easily work with testers to look for trends and help with root cause
analysis.
When results are found to contain significant data, we can always notify l-k.
-Nathan Dabney
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-29 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3ED66C83.8070608@austin.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-05-29 21:11 ` Nightly regression runs against current bk tree Andi Kleen
2003-05-29 21:25 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-29 21:29 ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-29 21:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-29 21:48 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-29 22:04 ` Craig Thomas
2003-05-29 22:05 ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-29 22:25 ` Cliff White
2003-05-29 23:41 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-29 21:50 ` Craig Thomas
2003-05-29 22:03 ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-29 22:16 ` Cliff White
2003-05-29 22:23 ` Nathan
2003-05-29 23:10 ` Mark Peloquin
2003-05-29 22:51 ` Mark Peloquin
2003-05-29 22:03 ` Nathan [this message]
2003-05-29 23:08 ` Mark Peloquin
2003-05-29 22:48 ` Mark Peloquin
2003-05-29 23:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-05-29 23:30 ` Cliff White
2003-06-03 16:04 Paul Larson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-29 20:24 Mark Peloquin
2002-10-27 12:13 New nanosecond stat patch for 2.5.44 Andi Kleen
2002-10-27 14:33 ` New nanosecond stat patch for 2.5.44 - new patch II Andi Kleen
2002-10-27 21:49 ` New nanosecond stat patch for 2.5.44 Andreas Dilger
2002-10-27 22:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-10-28 1:23 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-28 1:35 ` Rob Landley
2002-11-06 13:27 ` Gabriel Paubert
2002-11-06 18:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-10-27 23:16 ` Horst von Brand
2002-10-28 17:10 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-29 15:01 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-29 16:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-29 20:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-30 0:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30 21:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-30 22:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31 0:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-11-01 1:57 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-11-01 3:32 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030529220343.GL25252@osdl.org \
--to=smurf@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peloquin@austin.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.