From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: rddunlap@osdl.org
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: netlink tester program
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 20:35:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030602.203505.59678701.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33001.4.64.196.31.1054611142.squirrel@www.osdl.org>
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
The code is absolute, no doubt about it. It is the authority.
That doesn't make it right in all cases AFAIK.
I totally agree.
Now, given that I think that the netlink interface is poorly
documented, and that I'm trying to add some kernel code that
uses it, and that I'm trying to test said kernel code with a
userspace test program, I also plan to add such documentation
that I think is warranted to make it easy to use, even by
non-kernel devevlopers.
This is exactly how things should work. Where there is a need
for X _AND_ someone willing to create X, it will be created.
No arguments from me on this :-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-03 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 16:00 netlink tester program Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-31 0:11 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 3:22 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-31 6:42 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 12:09 ` Andi Kleen
2003-06-02 17:07 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-02 21:04 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-02 21:56 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 1:56 ` David Brownell
2003-06-03 2:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:34 ` David Brownell
2003-06-03 3:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:49 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-03 3:51 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 7:57 ` Hisham Kotry
2003-06-09 1:35 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-09 14:37 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-09 17:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 2:33 ` John S. Denker
2003-06-03 2:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:20 ` John S. Denker
2003-06-03 3:22 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:41 ` John S. Denker
2003-06-03 3:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:54 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-03 3:54 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:37 ` David Brownell
2003-06-03 3:32 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-03 3:35 ` David S. Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030602.203505.59678701.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.