All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.70-mm7 with contest
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:07:07 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306110707.21468.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Here are contest results with 2.5.70-mm7:

no_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              1   79      94.9    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.70-mm2          1   78      94.9    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.70-mm3          1   79      94.9    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.70-mm7          1   78      94.9    0.0     0.0     1.00
cacherun:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              1   75      98.7    0.0     0.0     0.95
2.5.70-mm2          1   75      98.7    0.0     0.0     0.96
2.5.70-mm3          1   76      97.4    0.0     0.0     0.96
2.5.70-mm7          1   75      97.3    0.0     0.0     0.96
process_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              2   109     67.9    63.5    28.4    1.38
2.5.70-mm2          2   108     68.5    65.5    28.7    1.38
2.5.70-mm3          2   108     68.5    64.5    28.7    1.37
2.5.70-mm7          2   107     68.2    67.5    29.9    1.37
ctar_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              3   103     75.7    0.0     0.0     1.30
2.5.70-mm2          3   118     66.9    1.0     5.1     1.51
2.5.70-mm3          3   114     70.2    1.0     5.3     1.44
2.5.70-mm7          3   117     65.8    0.0     0.0     1.50
xtar_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              3   106     72.6    1.0     3.8     1.34
2.5.70-mm2          3   123     61.8    2.0     4.8     1.58
2.5.70-mm3          3   123     62.6    2.3     5.7     1.56
2.5.70-mm7          3   148     50.7    2.7     5.4     1.90
io_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              5   326     21.5    112.9   18.7    4.13
2.5.70-mm2          4   115     67.0    42.0    19.1    1.47
2.5.70-mm3          4   116     66.4    40.6    18.8    1.47
2.5.70-mm7          4   107     70.1    37.0    17.6    1.37
io_other:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              2   122     63.9    53.8    22.1    1.54
2.5.70-mm2          2   113     68.1    46.2    20.4    1.45
2.5.70-mm3          2   116     66.4    50.0    22.2    1.47
2.5.70-mm7          2   111     68.5    43.0    19.6    1.42
read_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              2   104     75.0    6.3     4.8     1.32
2.5.70-mm2          2   106     73.6    8.2     5.7     1.36
2.5.70-mm3          2   104     75.0    8.2     5.8     1.32
2.5.70-mm7          2   135     56.3    11.3    6.6     1.73
list_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              2   96      80.2    0.0     7.3     1.22
2.5.70-mm2          2   94      81.9    0.0     7.4     1.21
2.5.70-mm3          2   95      80.0    0.0     7.4     1.20
2.5.70-mm7          2   96      77.1    0.0     6.2     1.23
mem_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              2   97      80.4    53.5    2.1     1.23
2.5.70-mm2          2   99      78.8    54.5    2.0     1.27
2.5.70-mm3          2   98      80.6    53.0    2.0     1.24
2.5.70-mm7          2   101     76.2    50.5    2.0     1.29
dbench_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.70              5   321     22.1    4.0     44.5    4.06
2.5.70-mm2          4   305     24.9    4.8     55.4    3.91
2.5.70-mm3          4   313     24.3    5.0     56.9    3.96
2.5.70-mm7          4   305     24.6    4.8     54.2    3.91

Shifts up in ctar, xtar, read and mem loads. Down in io and io_other.
Note I have posted contest benchmarks on 2.5.70-mm3 with 1000 v 100Hz 
previously.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+5kh+F6dfvkL3i1gRAklBAJ9KcqAYUp6P+m6XHlHtWvNnLxrA6gCfV4Te
gp8ZdArOodEWc1ivC9qbE7s=
=0DJc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


                 reply	other threads:[~2003-06-10 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200306110707.21468.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.