From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Maciej Soltysiak <solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:51:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030616145135.0ef5c436.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306161444090.18129@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:47:15 +0200 (CEST)
Maciej Soltysiak <solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv> wrote:
> > there seems to be a real serious problem with 2.4.21, routing through two
> > ethernet-devices. After 24 hours of a routing-only box the throughput from
> > ethernet a to ethernet b decreased to something around 4-100 kByte/sec (100
> > Mbit network 2 cards ns83820). I had to drop using 2.4.21 on this box
> > because of this. 2.4.20 is flawless on the machine and ran for around 100
> > days before without any troubles. Going back to 2.4.20 cured it.
> Are you using any netfilter patch-o-matic patches?
No.
> Does it also affect eg. ssh latency even on LAN ?
Not very seriously.
> Since I switched my processor from Intel do Amd, I have been experiencing
> similar but after longer periods of time than yours.
>
> I am also using VIA chipset, maybe it's a hardware driver problem.
No, my two boxes have differing mb's. One is VIA, the other is Intel440BX.
But I can also verify that the problem arises with 2.4.21-rc7, too. I guess it
is effectively an older problem that has not been recognised so far.
> Regards,
> Maciej
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-16 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-16 12:18 BUG REPORT: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21 Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-16 12:34 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-23 7:14 ` Michael Knigge
2003-06-23 11:42 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-16 12:47 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-06-16 12:51 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-06-16 13:10 ` Martin Zwickel
2003-06-16 18:18 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-17 19:33 ` BUG: Massive performance drop in conncetion time with 2.4.21 (62KB) Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-17 20:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-18 13:10 ` BUG: Massive performance drop in routing throughput " Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-18 14:16 ` Chris Friesen
2003-06-18 14:36 ` BUG: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21 Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-18 14:56 ` Chris Friesen
2003-06-18 17:20 ` BUG: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21 (62KB) David S. Miller
2003-06-19 12:24 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030616145135.0ef5c436.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.