From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported? Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:24:09 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030618142409.GI19556@poupinou.org> References: <200306181245.07941.simon@highlyillogical.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306181245.07941.simon@highlyillogical.org> Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Simon Cc: cpufreq@lists.arm.linux.org.uk On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:45:07PM +0100, Simon wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry about the dumb newbie question. Can't find any docs on this. > > I just upgraded to a vanilla 2.4.21 kernel, and want to add cpufreq support > back for my Intel P4, in my Thinkpad A31p. > > I had this working with 2.4.20, using the 'advanced' patch from > http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq/, and controlling it by echo-ing stuff to > /proc/cpufreq > > I couldn't make any of the patches on www.brodo.de/cpufreq_old apply to my > kernel cleanly. They look rather old, and the page is no longer in use. So I > donloaded the latest patch from ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/cpufreq/ > (ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/cpufreq/cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20030617.tar.bz2) > and applied this. This is even more older than the one you downloaded from Dominik site... Try the latest ac in the meantime. -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.