All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] PCI device list locking - take 2
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:33:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030618153324.A20212@figure1.int.wirex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030618212921.GA1807@kroah.com>; from greg@kroah.com on Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 02:29:21PM -0700

* Greg KH (greg@kroah.com) wrote:
>  static void *pci_seq_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> -	struct list_head *p = &pci_devices;
> +	struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
>  	loff_t n = *pos;
>  
> -	/* XXX: surely we need some locking for traversing the list? */
> +	dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev);
>  	while (n--) {
> -		p = p->next;
> -		if (p == &pci_devices)
> -			return NULL;
> +		dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev);
> +		if (dev == NULL)
> +			goto exit;

I think this still has the same problem.  pci_get_device grabs lock,
walks list, gets ref, and drops lock.  But the ref doesn't hold it on the
list, right?.  So some pci_remove_* could do list_del(&dev->global_list),
poison the prev/next pointers.  Subsequent pci_get_device would do ->next
and oops.  It seems the lock needs to be held for entire start/next/stop
sequence, or the ref needs to keep it on list.

> +struct pci_dev * 
> +pci_get_subsys(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device,
<snip>
> +exit:
> +	if (from)
> +		pci_put_dev(from);
> +	if (dev)
> +		pci_get_dev(dev);

Heh, the hch in me notes that pci_{put,get}_dev already check NULL device ;-)

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-18 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-18 21:29 [RFC] PCI device list locking - take 2 Greg KH
2003-06-18 22:33 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2003-06-18 22:46   ` Greg KH
2003-06-18 23:32     ` Chris Wright
2003-06-18 23:52       ` Greg KH
2003-06-19  0:20         ` Chris Wright

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030618153324.A20212@figure1.int.wirex.com \
    --to=chris@wirex.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.