From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot@poupinou.org>
Subject: Re: patch for PII4X?
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:07:41 +0200
Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <20030618180741.GL19556@poupinou.org>
References: <1055958873.7827.1.camel@zaphod>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1055958873.7827.1.camel@zaphod>
Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Shaya Potter <spotter-cpufreq@yucs.org>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.arm.linux.org.uk

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:54:33PM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote:
> I've noticed a decent amount of cvs activity recently for the PII4X. 
> any chance someone will provide a patch that applies against 2.4.21 or
> 2.4.21-ac1, or just push the changes to Alan directly?
> 

You can still use the one from

ftp://ftp.poupinou.org/cpufreq/

but I doubt the diff for alan tree will be ok for the most recent
2.4.21-ac1 though.

-- 
Ducrot Bruno

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.