From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon <simon@highlyillogical.org>
Subject: Re: newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported?
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:36:27 +0100
Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <200306181836.27693.simon@highlyillogical.org>
References: <200306181245.07941.simon@highlyillogical.org> <20030618141341.GA1442@brodo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20030618141341.GA1442@brodo.de>
Content-Disposition: inline
Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.arm.linux.org.uk

On Wednesday 18 June 2003 3:13 pm, Dominik Brodowski wrote:

> Fortunately, though, Dave Jones took over as maintainer. You can find an
> upgraded backport of cpufreq for 2.4.21-rc8 (which is [almost] the same as
> 2.4.21]) at
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cpufreq/

That did it, thanks! :)