From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzband.ncsc.mil (jazzband.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.4]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5K8ge3E006590 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 04:42:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jazzband.ncsc.mil (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jazzband.ncsc.mil with ESMTP id h5K8gd5e010847 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:42:40 GMT Received: from petrus.schuldei.org (petrus.schuldei.org [81.27.1.16]) by jazzband.ncsc.mil with ESMTP id h5K8gd92010844 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:42:39 GMT Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:40:27 +0200 From: Andreas Schuldei To: Stephen Smalley Cc: Russell Coker , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: how usable is selinux in lsm-2.5? Message-ID: <20030620084027.GA1852@schuldei.org> References: <20030618212607.GB5278@schuldei.org> <1056025963.1071.27.camel@moss-huskers.epoch.ncsc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1056025963.1071.27.camel@moss-huskers.epoch.ncsc.mil> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov * Stephen Smalley (sds@epoch.ncsc.mil) [030619 14:33]: > On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:27, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > I notice with satisfaction that lsm-2.5 with selinux configured > > in compiles fine here. > > Are you referring to the lsm-2.5 BitKeeper tree from either > lsm.bkbits.net or lsm.immunix.org? I did replace the SELinux module in > that tree with the new 2.5 SELinux, although the LSM patch in that tree > still includes various hooks that are not in mainline. You might want > to wait until we make an updated public release of the mainline > 2.5-based SELinux and use it. when do you expect to release that? > http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/lk, but it might be easier for you to wait > for an updated public release on the main download page. would that be the same date then above? -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.