From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shane@bogomip.com Subject: Re: Transmeta Longrun Support? Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:51:10 -0600 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030623165110.GD5108@bogomip.com> References: <20030622194439.GB5108@bogomip.com> <20030623134842.GE2330@brodo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030623134842.GE2330@brodo.de> Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 03:48:42PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:44:39PM -0600, shane@bogomip.com wrote: > > What does the cpufreq driver offer crusoe kernels that the longrun userspace utility can't already do. > > > > Just a standard proc interface to the settings? > AFAIK, yes. I'm not aware of that userspace utility, though. > Dominik http://freshmeat.net/projects/longrun/ I initially started using this, when I wasn't aware of the CPUFreq project. So CPUFreq doesn't modify the vm or do proc monitoring in the kernel to come up with better times to turn on fans and the like? Shane