From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: vpf-10680, minor corruptions Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:19:04 +0400 Message-ID: <20030624131904.GA460@namesys.com> References: <3EF07AFB.8060303@g-house.de> <20030618152626.GA17240@namesys.com> <3EF0A8E8.2000209@g-house.de> <20030619054535.GA23852@namesys.com> <3EF6AE67.5090502@namesys.com> <20030623090258.GA12259@namesys.com> <3EF6C83F.6060702@namesys.com> <3EF702CC.9050005@g-house.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EF702CC.9050005@g-house.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christian Kujau Cc: ReiserFS List Hello! On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 03:38:20PM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote: > as stated before, the corruptions occur only on this very alpha machine, Well, I still cannot build the kernel myself and still working on it. (having "make: *** [vmlinux] Error 139" and zero length vmlinux) BTW, I realised that I have not looked into your kernel config for that box, can you send it to me please? > bread: Cannot read the block (523914): (Input/output error). Hm, but still it means kernel returned some error for read request. > hah! i was not aware that the disk might have an hw problem, not a > single error ever showed up in my logs. this was weird. so i > re-partitioned the disk with a 10MB sde (to circumvent the bread error) > on the beginning and a 2 GB sde2. now reiserfsck/cp/diff are all working > fine under 2.4.21, but 2.5.72 is still erroneous. Sigh. > > btw: i am still using reiserfsprogs 3.6.8 now (since debian/testing has > 3.6.6) and i have compiled these utils under a 2.5.72 kernel. is it safe > to use them under 2.4 ? I see that you have used 2.5.70 and earlier kernels on alpha too. Do you have any idea of when stuff broke for you? Bye, Oleg