From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: vpf-10680, minor corruptions Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:28:21 +0400 Message-ID: <20030626062821.GA11176@namesys.com> References: <20030623090258.GA12259@namesys.com> <3EF6C83F.6060702@namesys.com> <3EF702CC.9050005@g-house.de> <20030624131904.GA460@namesys.com> <3EF86928.7080504@g-house.de> <20030624151940.GC21845@namesys.com> <3EF888B2.4000900@g-house.de> <3EF8EFF0.6020207@g-house.de> <20030625054031.GA11576@namesys.com> <3EF9A0F6.4030401@g-house.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EF9A0F6.4030401@g-house.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christian Kujau Cc: ReiserFS List Hello! On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:17:42PM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote: > under both (2.5.65+2.5.69) i was able to mkreiserfs sde2. mounting the > fs went ok, but copying data (cp -a /lib /mnt/reiserfs) brought several > kernel-errors (see https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/browse/reiserfs/). This "buffer layer error" problem was fixed in 2.5.71 or something like that, I think. I found it while merging "variable blocksize" patch. (that allowed me to have the same situation in which you are - blocksize is less than pagesize, only on x86) > but: diff -r showed _no_ differences betweeen the directories, a > following reiserfsck brought no vpf-10680 anymore! > so i'd say the problem occurs somewhere between 2.5.69 and 2.5.70. Hm. Ok, thank you for the testing. I am going to read the patches submitted at that time again. Bye, Oleg