From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.73-mm1 with contest
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:45:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306260945.46212.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
Recent contest benchmarks to compare with 2.5.73-mm1
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.72-mm1 1 78 93.6 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.72-mm2 1 77 94.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.73-mm1 1 77 94.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 1 76 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.72-mm1 1 74 98.6 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.72-mm2 1 75 97.3 0.0 0.0 0.97
2.5.73-mm1 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.97
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 107 70.1 65.0 28.7 1.35
2.5.72-mm1 2 107 68.2 65.0 29.0 1.37
2.5.72-mm2 2 108 67.6 66.5 28.7 1.40
2.5.73-mm1 2 108 67.6 67.0 29.6 1.40
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 3 103 75.7 0.0 0.0 1.30
2.5.72-mm1 3 107 72.0 0.7 3.7 1.37
2.5.72-mm2 3 105 73.3 1.0 5.7 1.36
2.5.73-mm1 3 103 74.8 0.0 0.0 1.34
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 3 104 74.0 1.0 3.8 1.32
2.5.72-mm1 3 113 66.4 2.0 4.4 1.45
2.5.72-mm2 3 118 63.6 2.0 4.2 1.53
2.5.73-mm1 3 113 66.4 2.0 4.4 1.47
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 4 356 21.9 128.9 19.3 4.51
2.5.72-mm1 4 122 62.3 43.8 18.7 1.56
2.5.72-mm2 4 119 63.0 44.1 20.0 1.55
2.5.73-mm1 4 127 59.1 39.7 16.5 1.65
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 120 65.0 51.2 23.0 1.52
2.5.72-mm1 2 112 67.9 44.5 19.5 1.44
2.5.72-mm2 2 111 68.5 44.6 19.6 1.44
2.5.73-mm1 2 112 67.9 43.0 19.6 1.45
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 104 75.0 6.3 4.8 1.32
2.5.72-mm1 2 104 74.0 7.7 6.7 1.33
2.5.72-mm2 2 106 71.7 7.7 8.5 1.38
2.5.73-mm1 2 100 76.0 7.8 7.0 1.30
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 97 79.4 0.0 7.2 1.23
2.5.72-mm1 2 93 80.6 0.0 6.5 1.19
2.5.72-mm2 2 93 80.6 0.0 5.4 1.21
2.5.73-mm1 2 93 80.6 0.0 7.5 1.21
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 95 82.1 54.0 2.1 1.20
2.5.72-mm1 2 111 69.4 53.5 1.8 1.42
2.5.72-mm2 2 111 69.4 53.5 1.8 1.44
2.5.73-mm1 2 114 68.4 54.0 1.8 1.48
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 4 397 19.6 5.5 50.4 5.03
2.5.72-mm1 4 333 22.5 4.2 44.7 4.27
2.5.72-mm2 4 328 22.6 4.5 48.0 4.26
2.5.73-mm1 4 365 20.8 5.0 48.2 4.74
Small differences only.
...so to answer your question Andrew, I don't see anything really showing up
in this benchmark.
Con
reply other threads:[~2003-06-25 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200306260945.46212.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.