From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: "Diego Calleja García" <diegocg@teleline.es>
Cc: dgp85@users.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PPP Modem connection impossible with 2.5.73-bk2
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:41:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030626164116.1bfbad1e.shemminger@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030626195238.673bcffd.diegocg@teleline.es>
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:52:38 +0200
Diego Calleja García <diegocg@teleline.es> wrote:
> On 25 Jun 2003 21:06:18 +0200
> Flameeyes <dgp85@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > After the upgrade from 2.5.73-bk1 to bk2 the pppd daemon is killed, so
> > the ppp connection is impossible.
> > After the reverse of the patch I can connect.
> > I also applied the bk2-bk3 patch (without the bk2), and I have no
> > problems.
> > So the problem is in bk2.
>
>
> I can confirm it.
> Jun 25 00:11:09 estel chat[13737]: -- got it
> Jun 25 00:11:09 estel chat[13737]: send (\d)
> Jun 25 00:11:10 estel pppd[13734]: Serial connection established.
> Jun 25 00:11:10 estel pppd[13734]: using channel 8
> Jun 25 00:11:10 estel pppd[13734]: Using interface ppp0
> Jun 25 00:11:10 estel pppd[13734]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magi
> c 0x54b41996> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1514> <asyncmap
> 0x0> <auth chap MD5> <magic 0xf1833c0e> <mrru 1514> <endpoint [null]>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <mrru 1514>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: rcvd [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <pcomp>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <magi
> c 0x54b41996> <accomp>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: Modem hangup
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: Connection terminated.
> Jun 25 00:11:12 estel pppd[13734]: tcsetattr: Invalid argument
> Jun 25 00:11:12 estel pppd[13734]: Exit.
>
>
> Plain 2.5.73 works.
What is your ppp configuration, anything special?
Is serial line fat or slow? Is this on SMP or UP system?
I can't reproduce this over a null modem cable so trying to see what could
be different.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-26 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-25 19:06 PPP Modem connection impossible with 2.5.73-bk2 Flameeyes
2003-06-26 17:52 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-06-26 23:41 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2003-06-27 0:28 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-06-27 20:20 ` Matthew Harrell
2003-06-27 20:57 ` Flameeyes
2003-06-27 21:51 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-06-27 22:06 ` Flameeyes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030626164116.1bfbad1e.shemminger@osdl.org \
--to=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=dgp85@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=diegocg@teleline.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.