Re: vpf-10680, minor corruptions

[Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>]

Hello!

On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 01:45:57PM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:

> your patch applied with no warnings, i really seem to have _not_ applied 
> the patch last time (sorry!),  because now i get a compiler error:
>   LD      fs/proc/proc.o
>   LD      fs/proc/built-in.o
>   CC      fs/ramfs/inode.o
>   LD      fs/ramfs/ramfs.o
>   LD      fs/ramfs/built-in.o
>   CC      fs/reiserfs/bitmap.o
> fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c: In function `old_hashed_relocation':
> fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c:593: error: long, short, signed or unsigned used 
> invalidly for `hash_in'
> make[3]: *** [fs/reiserfs/bitmap.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [fs/reiserfs] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 2

Aha, there is "u32 long" in line 593 in fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c file.
Remove the "long" word and it should compile.
Strange enough that it compiles with gcc 2.95 and gcc 3.2.2

Hm, interesting that I compiled gcc 2.95.3 on my alpha and still the kernel
built with this gcc dies aprox at a time when starting init too (jumps to zero again).

Thank you.

Bye,
    Oleg