From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wiktor Wodecki Message-ID: <20030629103226.GA661@gmx.de> References: <20030627202130.066c183b.akpm@digeo.com> <20030628115033.GA660@gmx.de> <20030628222938.78c16450.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030628222938.78c16450.akpm@digeo.com> Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: 2.5.73-mm2 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Jun 30 09:51:15 2003 List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Cc: Andrew Morton --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 10:29:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I have problems with lvm2 and the 2.5.73-mm2 patchset. > Could be because -mm uses a 64-bit dev_t. > Could you please revert=20 > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.5/2.5.73/2.5.= 73-mm2/broken-out/64-bit-dev_t-kdev_t.patch > and retest? yes, reverting this patch fixes the problem. Is it sane to run the -mm2 without this patch? > I think there's a version of devicemapper userspace which works correctly > with 64-bit dev_t. Perhaps the Sistina team can shed some light. =20 would be nice if somebody else could comment on this.. --=20 Regards, Wiktor Wodecki --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+/sA56SNaNRgsl4MRAv7BAJ9OmhQ2M/yjhbGPEY5h7zG7CZYJDgCfR6a3 +0AzU/YtvWcnKUyyV7ejHcg= =jYLU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--