All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: LM83 support
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030702090820.2c39fd00.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)


Hi everyone,

I will add support to LM83 to lm_sensors, as per request from ZOleg
Matrix <zoleg@matrixc.ru>. This is perfectly what I need to start with
real driver coding.

My question now. The LM83 could be supported by the ADM1021 module,
which already supports ADM1021, ADM1023, MAX1617, MAX1617A, NE1617,
NE1617A, TMC10, MC1066 and LM84. The LM84 can easily be seen as a light
version of the LM83. However, I think I remember we decided to avoid
adding support for new devices to existing drivers. Or is is just true
for the w83781d?

I see three possibilities:

1* A new driver for the LM83.

2* Support for LM83 added to adm1021

3* A new driver for the LM83 and move LM84 support to this new driver
(or any other support combination that would make as much sense as
possible.

I did not take a look at the code yet (just read LM83 and LM84
datasheets (very great BTW) and adm1021 and such detection routine in
sensors-detect) so I can't say what is technically the best choice.
However, I suppose that any solution will be easy, so the choice is
mainly a philosophical one, so to say.

So, what should we do?

-- 
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/

             reply	other threads:[~2005-05-19  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-19  6:24 Jean Delvare [this message]
2005-05-19  6:24 ` LM83 support Philip Pokorny
2005-05-19  6:24 ` Mark D. Studebaker 
2005-05-19  6:24 ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030702090820.2c39fd00.khali@linux-fr.org \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.