From: Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>
To: LinuxPPC Developers <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Cc: Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: fsck_hfs on PPC???
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 04:16:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030705041602.2a49d76d.billfink@mindspring.com> (raw)
Update:
I think I've got Apple's fsck_hfs working now on PPC, with Roman Zippel's
new Linux patch and two additional patches I worked up (see attached
e-mail message):
gwiz# fsck_hfs /dev/hda9
** /dev/hda9
** Checking HFS Plus volume.
** Checking Extents Overflow file.
** Checking Catalog file.
** Checking Catalog hierarchy.
** Checking volume bitmap.
** Checking volume information.
** The volume gwiz appears to be OK.
-Bill
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 03:59:59 -0400
From: Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: fsck_hfs on PPC???
Hi again,
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Bill Fink wrote:
>
> > I was trying to use your Linux patch for Apple's fsck_hfs on a
> > PPC system and not having much luck, so I was wondering if you
> > might have any ideas. The attached message to linuxppc-dev gives
> > the details. Basically I was able to get it to build OK with an
> > additional patch (included in the attached message) but running
> > fsck_hfs doesn't appear to do anything. I have a similar patch
> > for newfs_hfs but I haven't even tried to use that.
>
> I've updated the patch at http://www.ardistech.com/hfsplus/diskdev_cmds.diff.gz
> It should fix these problems, could you give it a try?
I think I've got it working now with the two additional attached
patches (to fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/HardLinkCheck.c and
fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/SDevice.c):
gwiz# fsck_hfs /dev/hda9
** /dev/hda9
** Checking HFS Plus volume.
** Checking Extents Overflow file.
** Checking Catalog file.
** Checking Catalog hierarchy.
** Checking volume bitmap.
** Checking volume information.
** The volume gwiz appears to be OK.
I haven't tried messing with newfs_hfs yet, so I don't know if it
would have similar issues.
-Thanks
-Bill
--- fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/.orig/HardLinkCheck.c 2003-07-04 12:11:21.000000000 -0400
+++ fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/.mod/HardLinkCheck.c 2003-07-04 12:18:06.000000000 -0400
@@ -45,10 +45,16 @@
#define _U2(v) { .u32 = ((((v) & 0xff000000) >> 24) | (((v) & 0xff0000) >> 8) | \
(((v) & 0xff00) << 8) | (((v) & 0xff) << 24)) }
#else
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
+#define _U(v) (v)
+#define _U2(v) (v)
+
+#else
#define _U(v) ((((v) >> 8) & 0xff) | (((v) & 0xff) << 8))
#define _U2(v) ((((v) & 0xff000000) >> 24) | (((v) & 0xff0000) >> 8) | \
(((v) & 0xff00) << 8) | (((v) & 0xff) << 24))
#endif
+#endif
HFSPlusCatalogKey gMetaDataDirKey = {
_U(48), /* key length */
--- fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/.orig/SDevice.c 2003-07-04 12:11:21.000000000 -0400
+++ fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/.mod/SDevice.c 2003-07-05 03:44:12.000000000 -0400
@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#if __linux__
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#endif
+
#if __APPLE__
#include <IOKit/storage/IOMediaBSDClient.h>
#else
@@ -71,6 +76,12 @@
return (0);
#else
struct stat statb;
+#ifdef __linux__
+ FILE *fp;
+ char partline[80+2];
+ int partmajor, partminor;
+ unsigned long long partn1kblocks;
+#endif
if (fstat(driveRefNum , &statb) < 0) {
return (-1);
}
@@ -79,6 +90,25 @@
*blockSize = 512;
return 0;
}
+ if (S_ISBLK(statb.st_mode)) {
+#ifdef __linux__
+ fp = fopen("/proc/partitions", "r");
+ if (fp) {
+ while (fgets(partline, 80, fp)) {
+ sscanf(partline, "%d %d %lld", &partmajor,
+ &partminor, &partn1kblocks);
+ if ((partmajor == MAJOR(statb.st_rdev)) &&
+ (partminor == MINOR(statb.st_rdev))) {
+ *numBlocks = partn1kblocks * 2;
+ *blockSize = 512;
+ fclose(fp);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+ fclose(fp);
+ }
+#endif
+ }
return (-1);
#endif
#else
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-05 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-05 8:16 Bill Fink [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-03 2:54 fsck_hfs on PPC??? Bill Fink
2003-07-03 8:11 ` Ethan Benson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030705041602.2a49d76d.billfink@mindspring.com \
--to=billfink@mindspring.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.