From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: rebased cpufreq patch? Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 19:38:39 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030707193839.C9758@suse.de> References: <20030707123448.GA1905@brodo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030707123448.GA1905@brodo.de>; from linux@brodo.de on Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:34:48PM +0200 Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: anders@trudheim.com, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against > > 2.4.22-pre3 ? > > I'll be working on an updated version within the next few days, check > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cpufreq/ for updated patches, please. > > > I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and > > cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without > > any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so > > if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great. > > IMHO it's no stuff for 2.4.22. Davej/Russell, what's your opinion about 2.4. > in general? I've no objection really, but it does mean that we would be introducing an already obsolete interface into mainline. (~Not htat that's really a problem, we did already for 2.5 anyway). Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs