All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Varsanyi <e0216@foo21.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: epoll vs stdin/stdout
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:02:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030708160206.GP9328@srv.foo21.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307080840400.4544@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com>

On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:42:29AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> It is not that events are delivered per-fd. If 3 and 4 refer to the same
> file* and you register both 3 and 4 with EPOLLIN, you'll get two events if
> an EPOLLIN happen. One for 3 and one for 4.

Agreed 100%, this is roughly what would happen with select() as well which      
IMO is good (not surprising behaviour) for event loop writers: it would         
return with both bits set. The EEXIST we were getting before this patch         
would be analogous to select() returning an error if you set 2 bits that        
where for fd's sharing an object (even across read/write bit vectors).          
                                                                                
One could argue at the logic of having 2 fd's get read events on a              
shared underlying object, but one read and the other write certainly            
makes sense as discussed earlier.                                               
                                                                                
Thanks again,                                                                   
-Eric Varsanyi                                                                  

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-08 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-07 15:48 epoll vs stdin/stdout Eric Varsanyi
2003-07-07 18:57 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-07 19:47   ` Eric Varsanyi
2003-07-07 20:03     ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-07 20:18       ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-07-07 21:20         ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-07-07 22:11       ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-08  0:24         ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-08  0:23           ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-07 22:12     ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-07 23:26       ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-08  0:32         ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-08  0:32           ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-08  0:52             ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-08  1:13               ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-08 12:34                 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-08 13:51                   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-08 15:20                     ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-08 15:46         ` Eric Varsanyi
2003-07-08 15:42           ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-08 16:02             ` Eric Varsanyi [this message]
2003-07-08 17:06               ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-08 18:40                 ` Eric Varsanyi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030708160206.GP9328@srv.foo21.com \
    --to=e0216@foo21.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.