From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: what's in a stable series?
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:53:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030710085338.C28672@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55L.0307100040271.6629@freak.distro.conectiva>; from marcelo@conectiva.com.br on Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:54:52AM -0300
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:54:52AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> The quota patches have been around for a long time, and Jan Kara has been
> trying to include for sometime now (since 2.4.20/21). I tried to avoid it.
>
> Now I realized the possible drawbacks of it are minimal (if any) compared
> to the overall advantage it brings to Linux 2.4.
Also the quota patches don't change any ABI or API - userland can still
use the old ABI in addition to the new one, 16bit ondisk quotas are
still supported and filesystems couldn't care less which implementation
it plugs into - the API is the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-10 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-10 1:06 RFC: what's in a stable series? Jeff Garzik
2003-07-10 1:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-10 3:34 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-10 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-10 11:22 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-10 12:36 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-10 3:54 ` Greg KH
2003-07-10 3:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-10 4:16 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-10 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-10 8:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-10 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2003-07-10 11:19 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-10 12:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-10 12:42 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-10 15:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-10 19:00 ` Jan Kara
2003-07-11 8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-11 9:21 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-10 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-10 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030710085338.C28672@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.