All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: "Muhammad Sarwar" <msarwar@mangrovesystems.com>
Cc: "Steven Rothweiler" <Stevenr@raritan.com>,
	linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: AgileDB and Abatron BDI 2000 ICE
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:48:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030711144834.C3B46C6D82@atlas.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 Jul 2003 10:31:56 EDT." <8529B5552D4EAA4DAEDF49650C64B2B437128C@TARPON.mangrovesystems.com>


In message <8529B5552D4EAA4DAEDF49650C64B2B437128C@TARPON.mangrovesystems.com> Muhammad Sarwar wrote:
>
> Main advantage of Agile is that it integrates Abatron's commands and
> GDB debugging services.

I have not used AgileDB yet. How does this integration work? I  mean,
how much more do you get than when using GDB's "monitor" command?

> Nice GUI for all BDI and GDB features at one place

You can use DDD and add some custom-defined buttons.

> Ability to move registers, structs etc to same watch window(by click
> and drag)  Tools to automate some processes like loading of register
> init file, playing back command script

I suspect this might be just using GDB features?

> Ability to set PC, other registers etc

Standard GDB features...

> Ability to use the same software for debugging of user applications

Standard GDB feature.

> However there are some problems:
>
> Program crashes frequently, they are offering new version of SW which
> is supposed to be more stable. Problems in setting break points.
> Problem in getting stack info display. Bug in display of struct
> info
>
> I think overall it brings good value for boot and kernel debugging.

I'm sorry, but from what you listed I don't see any advantages...

[But I have to admit that I've been using  GDB  and  CLI's  for  some
time...]

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

--
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd@denx.de
"The bad reputation UNIX has gotten is totally undeserved, laid on by
people who don't understand, who have not gotten in there  and  tried
anything."          -- Jim Joyce, owner of Jim Joyce's UNIX Bookstore

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-11 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-11 14:31 AgileDB and Abatron BDI 2000 ICE Muhammad Sarwar
2003-07-11 14:48 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-11 15:12 Steven Rothweiler
2003-07-11 15:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-07-11 14:58 Muhammad Sarwar
2003-07-11 15:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-07-11 13:58 Steven Rothweiler
2003-07-11 14:29 ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030711144834.C3B46C6D82@atlas.denx.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=Stevenr@raritan.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=msarwar@mangrovesystems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.