From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.75-mm1 with contest
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 23:56:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307132356.53835.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
More contest results including 2.5.75-mm1 with the last iteration of my
scheduler tweaks (O4int)
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 1 77 94.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.74 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.74-mm1 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.74-mm2 1 77 96.1 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.74-mm3 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.75 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.75-mm1 1 78 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.97
2.5.74 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.74-mm1 1 76 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.74-mm2 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.97
2.5.74-mm3 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.75 1 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.75-mm1 1 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.97
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 108 67.6 67.0 29.6 1.40
2.5.74 2 109 67.9 65.0 28.4 1.38
2.5.74-mm1 2 106 69.8 60.0 28.3 1.34
2.5.74-mm2 2 104 71.2 55.5 26.0 1.35
2.5.74-mm3 2 107 69.2 64.0 29.0 1.35
2.5.75 2 109 68.8 64.5 28.4 1.38
2.5.75-mm1 2 93 79.6 33.0 16.1 1.19
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 3 103 74.8 0.0 0.0 1.34
2.5.74 3 104 75.0 0.0 0.0 1.32
2.5.74-mm1 3 109 72.5 1.0 5.5 1.38
2.5.74-mm2 3 111 72.1 1.0 5.4 1.44
2.5.74-mm3 3 110 72.7 1.0 6.4 1.39
2.5.75 3 112 71.4 1.0 5.4 1.42
2.5.75-mm1 3 108 74.1 1.0 6.5 1.38
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 3 113 66.4 2.0 4.4 1.47
2.5.74 3 106 72.6 1.0 3.8 1.34
2.5.74-mm1 3 123 61.8 2.0 4.8 1.56
2.5.74-mm2 3 107 71.0 1.7 4.7 1.39
2.5.74-mm3 3 105 72.4 1.0 4.8 1.33
2.5.75 3 122 63.1 2.0 4.9 1.54
2.5.75-mm1 3 105 72.4 1.3 4.8 1.35
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 4 127 59.1 39.7 16.5 1.65
2.5.74 4 331 23.9 117.5 18.7 4.19
2.5.74-mm1 4 122 63.1 44.6 19.7 1.54
2.5.74-mm2 4 163 47.2 59.9 20.1 2.12
2.5.74-mm3 4 154 50.0 55.9 20.1 1.95
2.5.75 4 119 64.7 43.8 19.3 1.51
2.5.75-mm1 4 148 52.0 52.9 18.8 1.90
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 112 67.9 43.0 19.6 1.45
2.5.74 2 121 64.5 50.8 22.1 1.53
2.5.74-mm1 2 118 65.3 51.2 24.6 1.49
2.5.74-mm2 2 115 67.0 46.5 22.4 1.49
2.5.74-mm3 2 117 65.8 46.4 21.4 1.48
2.5.75 2 116 67.2 48.2 20.7 1.47
2.5.75-mm1 2 99 77.8 27.9 13.9 1.27
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 100 76.0 7.8 7.0 1.30
2.5.74 2 104 76.0 6.6 4.8 1.32
2.5.74-mm1 2 106 74.5 8.3 6.6 1.34
2.5.74-mm2 2 103 75.7 8.2 5.8 1.34
2.5.74-mm3 2 105 74.3 8.5 6.7 1.33
2.5.75 2 106 74.5 8.3 6.6 1.34
2.5.75-mm1 2 104 76.0 8.1 5.8 1.33
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 93 80.6 0.0 7.5 1.21
2.5.74 2 97 79.4 0.0 7.2 1.23
2.5.74-mm1 2 94 81.9 0.0 7.4 1.19
2.5.74-mm2 2 96 80.2 0.0 7.3 1.25
2.5.74-mm3 2 95 81.1 0.0 7.4 1.20
2.5.75 2 95 81.1 0.0 7.4 1.20
2.5.75-mm1 2 96 79.2 0.0 7.3 1.23
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 114 68.4 54.0 1.8 1.48
2.5.74 2 97 80.4 59.5 2.0 1.23
2.5.74-mm1 2 99 79.8 51.5 2.0 1.25
2.5.74-mm2 2 102 76.5 58.5 2.0 1.32
2.5.74-mm3 2 99 79.8 59.0 2.0 1.25
2.5.75 2 98 80.6 54.0 2.0 1.24
2.5.75-mm1 2 95 83.2 52.5 2.1 1.22
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 4 365 20.8 5.0 48.2 4.74
2.5.74 4 334 23.1 5.0 52.7 4.23
2.5.74-mm1 4 255 30.2 5.0 42.0 3.23
2.5.74-mm2 4 386 19.9 6.5 54.9 5.01
2.5.74-mm3 4 308 25.0 4.2 49.2 3.90
2.5.75 4 366 20.8 6.0 58.5 4.63
2.5.75-mm1 4 308 24.7 4.2 49.0 3.95
This last round of tweaks designed to speed up application start up seem to
speed up compile times by penalising process_load, io_other and mem_load. The
io_load rise introduced earlier is blunted a little further but still higher
than before the tweaks began. Only process load might be a little unfair
towards the load with quite a low ratio.
Con
reply other threads:[~2003-07-13 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307132356.53835.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.