All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>
To: Jean-Denis Boyer <jdboyer@m5t.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: ptrace Problem
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:49:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030715174945.G12505@borg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AB5AF73EAF23304EA1B932174137CED70303AE@m5tmail.m5t.com>; from jdboyer@m5t.com on Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:30:26PM -0400


On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:30:26PM -0400, Jean-Denis Boyer wrote:

> Which chip is it?

An unreleased 603-ish core with other stuff added.

> Is it correctly recognized by the kernel
> (arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c)?

I long ago added an entry to cputable.c, and am using it.  I'll look
at those specifics again though.  Good tip.  ...and I just made a
change that might help...  and that didn't help

> This is a silly question, but, did you try to unplug the BDI-2000
> before running gdbserver? Just in case it stops on some exceptions...

If I understood correctly: use Abatron to download my code, make sure
things are running, them pull that power, and things still run.
Attempt to do gdb/gdbserver and it malfunctions in the same way--or at
least I think so, I don't have an Abatron hooked up.

> Do you use a somewhat recent version of glibc, and was it built
> against a somewhat recent version of kernel? Can you also tell us
> the version of binutils and gcc ? Not all the combinations are
> reliable ;-)

Looking at likely source tarballs we have sitting around it seems very
likely that binutils were built from 2.13.2.1, and glibc 2.3.2.  (How
can I be sure?)

gcc reports 3.2.2.

Are those a compatible set?


Thanks,

-kb

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-15 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-15 16:30 ptrace Problem Jean-Denis Boyer
2003-07-15 21:49 ` Kent Borg [this message]
2003-07-16 10:37   ` Kenneth Johansson
2003-07-16 14:26     ` Kent Borg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-16 19:46 Jean-Denis Boyer
2003-07-15 15:43 Kent Borg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030715174945.G12505@borg.org \
    --to=kentborg@borg.org \
    --cc=jdboyer@m5t.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.