From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PS2 mouse going nuts during cdparanoia session.
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:08:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030717170811.GC4280@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1058440490.8620.18.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:15:04PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Dave just a random pondering looking over the code - does it make any
> difference if you stick a udelay(50) at the top of wait_read and
> wait_write in i8042.c. Right now we don't always seem to honour the
> delays for certain specific patterns of I/O and interrupt.
>
> Ditto the read_status/read_data loop in the _interrupt code path.
No joy.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-17 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-16 16:57 PS2 mouse going nuts during cdparanoia session Dave Jones
2003-07-16 17:03 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 17:09 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-16 17:13 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 17:20 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-16 17:24 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 17:21 ` Markus Plail
2003-07-16 17:10 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-16 17:16 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 17:23 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-16 17:25 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 17:28 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-16 17:31 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 18:22 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-16 19:03 ` Kristofer T. Karas
2003-07-16 19:13 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-16 19:00 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-16 19:30 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-16 20:53 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-16 23:31 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-16 23:47 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-17 11:15 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-17 17:08 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-07-16 18:00 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-16 18:56 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-16 21:05 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-16 17:10 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-16 17:17 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 17:55 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-16 17:57 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1058422511.1164.1440.camel@workshop.saharacpt.lan>
2003-07-17 12:39 ` Dave Jones
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-16 23:43 Mikael Pettersson
2003-07-17 2:03 ` Jacek Kawa
2003-07-17 21:44 ` Jacek Kawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030717170811.GC4280@suse.de \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.