From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: emmel <the_emmel@gmx.net>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: powernow-k7 (again) on 2.4.20
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:58:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030722115800.GA1160@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03072108302101.00222@gate>
Hi "emmel",
This is not a cpufreq bug, but a bug in the BIOS. It reports wrong values in
the "PST" which should be dumped in "dmesg" when you load the powernow
module [or once it is started, in case you built it into the kernel]. You
might want to try up- or downgrading your BIOS or to override the BIOS
table; some patches for this are in the list archives, Dave Jones intends to
add a generic capability to override the PST to the powernow module in
future.
Dominik
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:30:21AM +0200, emmel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've posted that before, but I've serious trouble with cpufreq. It returns
> once loaded it makes the CPU speed drop from 1.4GHz to 800MHz (666 when
> throttled). If the kde info thingy is somewhat relyable at all that's for
> real - the bogomips drop as well. Returning to 1.4GHz seems impossible
> without restarting (I've tried unloading the module). Somehow cpufreq gets
> the stupid idea that the CPU is scaleable between 500 and 600MHz which has to
> be the reason for those odd results. We are talking about a Mobile Athlon XP
> 1600+ here, BTW (though it's reported by linux as a 1500+). If you ask me
> that's a serious problem. The odd thing, however, is that it didn't happen
> with the same kernel version before. Maybe it depends on some intel code to
> work correct (I used to have the CPU in the kernel set to PIII, now it's
> correctly at Athlon) or maybe it has something to do with the swsp patch that
> I *don't* have applied to my actual kernel. HELP!
> The same odd behavior(sp?) appears with clean 2.5.72 and 2.6.0-test1 kernels.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-22 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-21 6:30 powernow-k7 (again) on 2.4.20 emmel
2003-07-22 11:58 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
[not found] ` <03072308501000.00222@gate>
[not found] ` <20030723163415.GA1870@brodo.de>
2003-07-24 5:10 ` emmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030722115800.GA1160@brodo.de \
--to=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=the_emmel@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.