From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-lkm@lina.inka.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences?
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:49:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030726224937.GA6982@rdlg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1059223010.1879.6.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 885 bytes --]
Yeah but likely nothing along the line of correspondence of them
offering you the stuff if you give them a copy of your work on SMP which
would happen to be GPL'd....
Thus spake Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk):
> On Sad, 2003-07-26 at 01:47, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> > Too bad you don't have anything they gave you or which they took back
> > from you that could be used against them.
>
> Its a matter of archived public record since long ago
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
Diagnosis: witzelsucht
IPv6 = robert@ipv6.rdlg.net http://ipv6.rdlg.net
IPv4 = robert@mail.rdlg.net http://www.rdlg.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-26 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-25 14:24 2.4 -> 2.2 differences? Robert L. Harris
2003-07-25 18:08 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-07-25 22:34 ` jw schultz
2003-07-25 23:29 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-07-26 0:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-26 0:47 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-07-26 12:36 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-26 22:49 ` Robert L. Harris [this message]
2003-07-26 15:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-28 15:00 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-07-31 19:32 ` Andrew Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030726224937.GA6982@rdlg.net \
--to=robert.l.harris@rdlg.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ecki-lkm@lina.inka.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.