From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:04:55 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Grant Grundler , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Generic light-weight syscall. Message-ID: <20030728190455.GE32553@systemhalted> References: <20030725063739.GA13017@systemhalted> <20030725113700.GH1485@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030726174845.GF31744@systemhalted> <20030726180031.GG31744@systemhalted> <20030727122745.GC16753@dsl2.external.hp.com> <20030728155703.GA32553@systemhalted> <20030728174551.GC3840@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20030728174551.GC3840@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > You know, you don't even need kernel help for this. According to page > 2-5 of the Kane book, the Interval Timer is accessible by non-privileged > instructions. Isn't this going to be different for all CPU's? Which means if you get scheduled around you might see negative moving time? c.