From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: rickh@capaccess.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-assembly@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The Well-Factored 386
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:27:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030729002737.111bc3ad.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030728133300.2ef96cf4.davem@redhat.com>
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:33:00 -0700
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:33:58 -0400
> "Rick A. Hohensee" <rickh@capaccess.org> wrote:
>
> > Rick Hohensee July 2003
> >
> > Why, Rick? WHY?
>
> Rick, I wish you luck finding another machine with lists to
> infiltrate.
>
> Because you're not going to do it on vger.kernel.org any more.
> Bye bye.
Dave, I have to tell you I don't like your attitude shown in this case. Surely
you can argue Rick does not really stay on a specific topic, but on the other
hand he does not really flood the list, does he? I mean, compared to (name
deleted)s' PR bubbles he is really low volume.
Besides I have not read any complaints (1 pro) - only yours. Which leads me to
think you kill him only because you don't like the man - and not really because
of his writing - and because you _can_. This does not feel alright for me.
Don't get me wrong, I am no Rick-fan, I don't know him and have no idea why he
is really talking about his favourite topics. But I honour his right to speak
up just like anybody else, even if it looks more like a "brainstorming" than
constructive talking.
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-28 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-28 8:44 The Well-Factored 386 Rick A. Hohensee
2003-07-28 14:06 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-28 16:36 ` hp
2003-07-28 20:33 ` Rick A. Hohensee
2003-07-28 20:33 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-28 22:27 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-07-28 22:30 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-28 22:58 ` David D. Hagood
2003-07-29 14:32 ` Timothy Miller
2003-07-29 17:21 ` hp
2003-07-29 0:34 ` jw schultz
2003-07-29 1:27 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-29 3:49 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-29 4:25 ` Gene Heskett
2003-07-29 4:42 ` jw schultz
2003-07-29 12:04 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-29 14:55 ` Timothy Miller
2003-07-29 8:45 ` hp
2003-07-28 23:11 ` viro
2003-07-29 0:17 ` Brian Raiter
2003-07-29 16:49 ` Maciej Hrebien
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-28 16:02 The well-factored 386 Jack Dennon
2003-07-28 16:32 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-28 16:46 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-28 16:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-28 19:31 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-28 19:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-29 11:14 ` Helge Hafting
2003-07-29 16:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-30 7:11 ` Helge Hafting
2003-07-30 14:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-29 12:59 John Bradford
2003-07-29 13:32 ` Ville Herva
2003-07-29 21:41 Jack Dennon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030729002737.111bc3ad.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-assembly@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rickh@capaccess.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.