From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
Cc: Kurt Wall <kwall@kurtwerks.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@prefeitura.sp.gov.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning.
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:20:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030729102007.GC1286@louise.pinerecords.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030729101126.GC29124@werewolf.able.es>
> [jamagallon@able.es]
>
> > Does Mandrake also ship "stable" distributions w/ kernels compiled using
> > gcc 3.3-whatever or is that idiocy suse-specific?
>
> Tell me a distro that ships pristine www.kernel.org kernels o release
> gcc's, without any 'backported patch from xxx-1234 to correct PR1234'.
Slackware (whenever possible).
> What is the difference between backporting a patch from 3.3.1-pre to 3.3,
> and using 3.3.1-pre directly ? Ah, that you get less bug corrected.
Large. 3.3 is a development series. It DOES introduce new stuff.
In production environments you definitely want to stick with 3.2.3
or (better yet) 2.95.3.
$ head -4 Makefile
VERSION = 2
PATCHLEVEL = 4
SUBLEVEL = 22
EXTRAVERSION = -pre8
$ grep 'recommended compiler' Documentation/Changes
The recommended compiler for the kernel is gcc 2.95.x (x >= 3), and it
> And no, at least in my case, this is not a stable Mandrake, it is Cooker,
> the equivalent of RawHide. Latest stable shiped a kernel built with 3.2.3,
Ok.
--
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-29 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-28 12:40 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning Luiz Capitulino
2003-07-28 20:29 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-07-28 22:50 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-29 0:22 ` Kurt Wall
2003-07-29 4:55 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-29 9:28 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-07-29 9:35 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-29 9:48 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-07-29 9:58 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-29 10:11 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-07-29 10:20 ` Tomas Szepe [this message]
2003-07-29 11:57 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-29 15:35 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-08-17 1:25 ` Richard Henderson
2003-08-17 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-08-17 2:04 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-07-29 12:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030729102007.GC1286@louise.pinerecords.com \
--to=szepe@pinerecords.com \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=kwall@kurtwerks.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@prefeitura.sp.gov.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.