From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:38:16 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Richard Hirst Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Grant Grundler , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Generic light-weight syscall. Message-ID: <20030729233816.GC17107@systemhalted> References: <20030726174845.GF31744@systemhalted> <20030726180031.GG31744@systemhalted> <20030727122745.GC16753@dsl2.external.hp.com> <20030728155703.GA32553@systemhalted> <20030728174551.GC3840@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030728190455.GE32553@systemhalted> <20030728191420.GE3840@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030728211012.GC6706@sleepie.demon.co.uk> <20030729175057.GA17107@systemhalted> <20030729210609.GK6706@sleepie.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20030729210609.GK6706@sleepie.demon.co.uk> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > Depends what people want to use it for. I couldn't use it to time how > long some syscall took, for example. But if we zap the microseconds > part on smp anyway, that's irrelevant. useconds gets zapped in gettimeofday on SMP systems. I'm working on trying to fix this :) c.