From: brian@futuretel.com
To: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@ratnaweera.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Contributing to the kernel while being employed
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:54:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030730185407.GA12651@top.worldcontrol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1059574407.1759.26.camel@anuradha>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:13:27AM -0400, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
>
> Slightly off-topic, but not completely ...
>
> Before working for a commercial organization, one usually has to sign a
> contract which makes all the work done during the period of employment
> (including innovations, "hobby" coding done during "after hours")
> copyrighted by the employer. This introduces various problems when one
> wishes to do open source development, especially as a hobby.
In California, USA:
There is no such thing as a free lunch, even as an employer.
A clause of that sort it technically unenforceable.
However, due to a broken tort system, there is an indirect way for
an employer to enforce such a clause. However, this same strategy
works whether you signed such an agreement or not and whether
such a clause exists or not, thus this risk isn't directly related
to the issue.
The bottom line being that having or not having such a clause
in your contract won't change your liability (at least in California).
--
Brian Litzinger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-30 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-30 14:13 Contributing to the kernel while being employed Anuradha Ratnaweera
2003-07-30 14:36 ` Wichert Akkerman
2003-07-30 14:38 ` Bas Mevissen
2003-07-30 14:46 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-30 15:05 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-30 18:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-30 15:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-30 18:54 ` brian [this message]
2003-07-31 12:58 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-30 14:50 Anuradha Ratnaweera
2003-07-30 14:58 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-30 15:13 ` Bas Mevissen
2003-07-30 15:05 Downing, Thomas
2003-07-30 15:11 Anuradha Ratnaweera
2003-07-30 16:31 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-30 16:58 ` henrique2.gobbi
2003-07-30 17:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-30 17:43 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030730185407.GA12651@top.worldcontrol.com \
--to=brian@futuretel.com \
--cc=anuradha@ratnaweera.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.