All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Philip Graham Willoughby <pgw99@doc.ic.ac.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:28:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030730232843.GA5764@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030729151701.GA6795@bodmin.doc.ic.ac.uk>

On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:17:03PM +0100, Philip Graham Willoughby wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This patch adds an abstraction layer for programmable LED devices,
> hardware drivers for the Status LEDs found on some Intel PIIX4E based
> server hardware (notably the ISP1100 1U rackmount server) and LEDs wired
> to the parallel port data lines.

Some minor comments:
	- read Documentation/CodingStyle and apply it to your code.
	- fix up the usages of the MOD_* functions.  Get rid of the ones
	  for the file_ops and have the core increment the count of the
	  drivers before the core calls them.
	- please do not use ioctls.  They are hell for 64bit kernels.
	  Use either a filesystem for your subsystem, or sysfs.
	- try doing this for 2.6 first if you want any chance at all to
	  get it into the main kernel trees.

Good luck,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-30 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-29 15:17 PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-29 18:00 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 11:45   ` Jamey Hicks
2003-07-30 12:06     ` PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystemever Ghozlane Toumi
2003-07-30 12:27       ` Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-30 12:39         ` Wichert Akkerman
2003-07-30 12:27     ` PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever Pavel Machek
2003-07-30  6:36 ` CaT
2003-07-30 13:00   ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-30 13:20     ` CaT
2003-07-30 23:28 ` Greg KH [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-29 19:15 John Bradford
2003-07-29 19:51 ` Tim Hockin
2003-07-29 20:09 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-07-29 21:20 ` Kent Borg
2003-07-29 21:44   ` Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-30 21:44     ` Mike Jagdis
2003-07-30 12:15 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-29 20:38 John Bradford
2003-07-29 20:37 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-29 21:34   ` Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-29 20:40 ` Randolph Bentson
2003-07-29 21:15   ` Ryan Flowers
2003-07-29 20:43 ` Eli Carter
2003-07-30  6:09   ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-30  6:37   ` Helge Deller
2003-07-30 12:27 "Andrey Borzenkov" 
2003-07-30 15:50 John Bradford
2003-07-30 16:08 John Bradford
2003-07-30 17:44 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 18:50   ` Marc Giger
2003-07-30 19:05     ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-30 22:22     ` Brian McGroarty
2003-07-30 18:56   ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-30 19:02     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 19:06     ` Marc Giger
2003-07-30 19:16       ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-31  8:31 ` jw schultz
2003-07-30 18:50 John Bradford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030730232843.GA5764@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pgw99@doc.ic.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.