From: Erich Focht <efocht@hpce.nec.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSE <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [patch] scheduler fix for 1cpu/node case
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 18:30:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308011830.07280.efocht@hpce.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <380280000.1059697615@flay>
On Friday 01 August 2003 02:26, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> np - was easy to fix up ;-) I did run some benchmarks on it ...
> low end SDET seemed highly variable, but otherwise looked OK.
> If I have only 4 tasks running on a 16x (4x4), what's the rate
> limit on the idle cpus trying to steal now?
the rate is 3ms, that's a bit too fast, maybe. And the busy rate is
200ms (instead of 400). I made some experiments with 2 CPUs per node
and 1 ms seems to be definitely too fast. I'll tune the formula a
bit...
Regards,
Erich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-01 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-28 19:16 [patch] scheduler fix for 1cpu/node case Erich Focht
2003-07-28 19:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-28 20:18 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-28 20:37 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-29 2:24 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-07-29 10:08 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-29 13:33 ` [Lse-tech] " Andrew Theurer
2003-07-30 15:23 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-30 15:44 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-07-29 14:27 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-13 20:49 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-22 15:46 ` [Lse-tech] " Andrew Theurer
2003-08-22 22:56 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-23 0:12 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-23 0:29 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-23 0:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-23 8:48 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-23 14:32 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-23 1:31 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-29 10:08 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-29 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-31 15:05 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-31 21:45 ` Erich Focht
2003-08-01 0:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-01 16:30 ` Erich Focht [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-29 14:06 [Lse-tech] " Mala Anand
2003-07-29 14:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-29 16:04 Mala Anand
2003-07-30 16:34 Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308011830.07280.efocht@hpce.nec.com \
--to=efocht@hpce.nec.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.