From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 04 Aug 2003 02:41:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from p508B6AA9.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.106.169]:48317 "EHLO dea.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 02:41:35 +0100 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h741fXpR004443; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 03:41:33 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h741fWB5004442; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 03:41:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 03:41:32 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Pete Popov Cc: Linux MIPS mailing list Subject: Re: udelay Message-ID: <20030804014132.GA4419@linux-mips.org> References: <1059788948.9224.62.camel@zeus.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1059788948.9224.62.camel@zeus.mvista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 2973 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 06:49:08PM -0700, Pete Popov wrote: > Looks like the latest udelay in 2.4 is borked. Anyway else notice that > problem? I did a 10 sec test: mdelay works, udelay is broken, at least > for the CPU and toolchain I'm using. That just doesn't make sense. Mdelay is based on udelay so if udelay is broken mdelay should be broken, too. Ralf