All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FS: hardlinks on directories
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:32:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030804153236.5748ba38.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16174.21970.527300.160659@laputa.namesys.com>

On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:47:14 +0400
Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM> wrote:

> Hard links on directories are hard to do in the UNIX file system model.
> 
> Where ".." should point? How to implement rmdir? You can think about
> UNIX unlink as some form of reference counter based garbage
> collector---when last (persistent) reference to the object is removed it
> is safe to recycle it. It is well-known that reference counting GC
> cannot cope with cyclical references. Usually this is not a problem for
> the file system because all cyclical references are very well
> known---they always involve "." and "..". But as one allows hard links
> on directories, file system is no longer tree, but generic directed
> graph and reference counting GC wouldn't work.

If file-/directory-nodes are single-linked list nodes inside one directory, and
directory-nodes pointing to the same directory are single-linked list nodes,
you can:

- ".." do as first node of a directory and the "shared" part of the directory
follows on its next-pointer, so you have one ".." for every hard-link.
- implement rmdir as throw-away dir-node and ".." node and only if pointer to
next hw-linked directory-node is itself remove rest of linked node list

Are there further questionable operations?

Regards,
Stephan



  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-04 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-04 12:15 FS: hardlinks on directories Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 12:45 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-08-04 13:22   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 13:37     ` Christian Reichert
2003-08-04 13:44       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 14:22         ` Christian Reichert
2003-08-04 15:31     ` Jeff Muizelaar
2003-08-04 16:15       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  2:45         ` Neil Brown
2003-08-05  9:41           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-06  1:12             ` Neil Brown
2003-08-06 10:14               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-07  2:27                 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-04 12:47 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-08-04 13:32   ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-08-04 13:44 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-04 13:56   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 14:04     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-08-04 14:50       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 20:03         ` Olivier Galibert
2003-08-04 21:16         ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 23:34           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 14:20             ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 14:44               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 22:58         ` Andrew Pimlott
2003-08-05  0:19           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  1:18             ` Andrew Pimlott
2003-08-05  8:04               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 11:18                 ` Wakko Warner
2003-08-04 14:33     ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 15:05       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 15:57         ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-04 21:23           ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 16:11         ` Adam Sampson
2003-08-04 17:00         ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-04 17:18           ` Sean Neakums
2003-08-05  4:53           ` jw schultz
2003-08-04 18:50         ` jlnance
2003-08-04 21:09         ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 22:13           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 22:32           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 23:00             ` Randolph Bentson
2003-08-05  0:10               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  2:09                 ` Edgar Toernig
2003-08-05  8:05                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 12:51             ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-05 13:03               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 13:13                 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2003-08-05 13:39                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 13:36                 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-05 14:04                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 14:57                     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-05 15:08                       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 15:02                     ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 15:12                       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 15:44                       ` Trond Myklebust
2003-08-05 14:56                   ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 22:08                 ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-24 17:35                   ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-24 19:02                     ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-24 19:15                     ` Alexander G. M. Smith
2003-08-25  8:27                     ` Nikita Danilov
2003-08-25 15:48                       ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-05 14:12             ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 14:21               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 15:53                 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 20:47     ` Jan Harkes
2003-08-04 15:42   ` Brian Pawlowski
2003-08-04 15:56     ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 16:16       ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 16:35         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 16:54           ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 17:18             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 17:25               ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 21:38           ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05  0:06             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  3:11           ` Neil Brown
2003-08-04 21:29       ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 23:42         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 16:46           ` viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030804153236.5748ba38.skraw@ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.