From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Fedyk Subject: Re: Filesystem Tests Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:04:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20030806180427.GC21290@matchmail.com> References: <3F306858.1040202@mrs.umn.edu> <20030805224152.528f2244.akpm@osdl.org> <3F310B6D.6010608@namesys.com> <20030806183410.49edfa89.diegocg@teleline.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030806183410.49edfa89.diegocg@teleline.es> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Diego Calleja Garc?a Cc: Hans Reiser , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:34:10PM +0200, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote: > El Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:06:37 +0400 Hans Reiser escribi?: > > > I don't think ext2 is a serious option for servers of the sort that > > Linux specializes in, which is probably why he didn't measure it. > > Why? Because if you have a power outage, or a crash, you have to run the filesystem check tools on it or risk damaging it further. Journaled filesystems have a much smaller chance of having problems after a crash.