From: Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@intel.com>
To: bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master's settings to slaves
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 17:44:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308081744.58946.shmulik.hen@intel.com> (raw)
2 - Change monitoring function use the new functionality.
diff -Nuarp linux-2.4.22-rc1/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c linux-2.4.22-rc1-devel/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
--- linux-2.4.22-rc1/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c Fri Aug 8 14:03:16 2003
+++ linux-2.4.22-rc1-devel/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c Fri Aug 8 14:03:17 2003
@@ -2207,8 +2207,9 @@ out:
static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_device *master)
{
bonding_t *bond = (struct bonding *) master->priv;
- slave_t *slave, *bestslave, *oldcurrent;
+ slave_t *slave, *oldcurrent;
int slave_died = 0;
+ int do_failover = 0;
read_lock(&bond->lock);
@@ -2218,7 +2219,6 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_
* program could monitor the link itself if needed.
*/
- bestslave = NULL;
slave = (slave_t *)bond;
read_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
@@ -2226,8 +2226,6 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_
read_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
while ((slave = slave->prev) != (slave_t *)bond) {
- /* use updelay+1 to match an UP slave even when updelay is 0 */
- int mindelay = updelay + 1;
struct net_device *dev = slave->dev;
int link_state;
u16 old_speed = slave->speed;
@@ -2238,14 +2236,7 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_
switch (slave->link) {
case BOND_LINK_UP: /* the link was up */
if (link_state == BMSR_LSTATUS) {
- /* link stays up, tell that this one
- is immediately available */
- if (IS_UP(dev) && (mindelay > -2)) {
- /* -2 is the best case :
- this slave was already up */
- mindelay = -2;
- bestslave = slave;
- }
+ /* link stays up, nothing more to do */
break;
}
else { /* link going down */
@@ -2285,6 +2276,7 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_
(bond_mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD)) {
bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(slave);
}
+
printk(KERN_INFO
"%s: link status definitely down "
"for interface %s, disabling it",
@@ -2301,12 +2293,10 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_
bond_alb_handle_link_change(bond, slave, BOND_LINK_DOWN);
}
- write_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
- if (slave == bond->current_slave) {
- /* find a new interface and be verbose */
- reselect_active_interface(bond);
+ if (slave == oldcurrent) {
+ do_failover = 1;
}
- write_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
+
slave_died = 1;
} else {
slave->delay--;
@@ -2321,13 +2311,6 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_
master->name,
(downdelay - slave->delay) * miimon,
dev->name);
-
- if (IS_UP(dev) && (mindelay > -1)) {
- /* -1 is a good case : this slave went
- down only for a short time */
- mindelay = -1;
- bestslave = slave;
- }
}
break;
case BOND_LINK_DOWN: /* the link was down */
@@ -2397,26 +2380,12 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_
bond_alb_handle_link_change(bond, slave, BOND_LINK_UP);
}
- write_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
- if ( (bond->primary_slave != NULL)
- && (slave == bond->primary_slave) )
- reselect_active_interface(bond);
- write_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
- }
- else
+ if ((oldcurrent == NULL) ||
+ (slave == bond->primary_slave)) {
+ do_failover = 1;
+ }
+ } else {
slave->delay--;
-
- /* we'll also look for the mostly eligible slave */
- if (bond->primary_slave == NULL) {
- if (IS_UP(dev) && (slave->delay < mindelay)) {
- mindelay = slave->delay;
- bestslave = slave;
- }
- } else if ( (IS_UP(bond->primary_slave->dev)) ||
- ( (!IS_UP(bond->primary_slave->dev)) &&
- (IS_UP(dev) && (slave->delay < mindelay)) ) ) {
- mindelay = slave->delay;
- bestslave = slave;
}
}
break;
@@ -2435,26 +2404,17 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_
} /* end of while */
- /*
- * if there's no active interface and we discovered that one
- * of the slaves could be activated earlier, so we do it.
- */
- read_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
- oldcurrent = bond->current_slave;
- read_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
+ if (do_failover) {
+ write_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
- /* no active interface at the moment or need to bring up the primary */
- if (oldcurrent == NULL) { /* no active interface at the moment */
- if (bestslave != NULL) { /* last chance to find one ? */
- write_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
- change_active_interface(bond, bestslave);
- write_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
- } else if (slave_died) {
- /* print this message only once a slave has just died */
+ reselect_active_interface(bond);
+ if (oldcurrent && !bond->current_slave) {
printk(KERN_INFO
"%s: now running without any active interface !\n",
master->name);
}
+
+ write_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
}
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
@@ -2472,9 +2432,10 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct net_
static void loadbalance_arp_monitor(struct net_device *master)
{
bonding_t *bond;
- slave_t *slave;
+ slave_t *slave, *oldcurrent;
int the_delta_in_ticks = arp_interval * HZ / 1000;
int next_timer = jiffies + (arp_interval * HZ / 1000);
+ int do_failover = 0;
bond = (struct bonding *) master->priv;
if (master->priv == NULL) {
@@ -2498,6 +2459,10 @@ static void loadbalance_arp_monitor(stru
read_lock(&bond->lock);
+ read_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
+ oldcurrent = bond->current_slave;
+ read_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
+
/* see if any of the previous devices are up now (i.e. they have
* xmt and rcv traffic). the current_slave does not come into
* the picture unless it is null. also, slave->jiffies is not needed
@@ -2524,21 +2489,19 @@ static void loadbalance_arp_monitor(stru
* current_slave being null after enslaving
* is closed.
*/
- write_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
- if (bond->current_slave == NULL) {
+ if (oldcurrent == NULL) {
printk(KERN_INFO
"%s: link status definitely up "
"for interface %s, ",
master->name,
slave->dev->name);
- reselect_active_interface(bond);
+ do_failover = 1;
} else {
printk(KERN_INFO
"%s: interface %s is now up\n",
master->name,
slave->dev->name);
}
- write_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
}
} else {
/* slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP */
@@ -2561,11 +2524,9 @@ static void loadbalance_arp_monitor(stru
master->name,
slave->dev->name);
- write_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
- if (slave == bond->current_slave) {
- reselect_active_interface(bond);
+ if (slave == oldcurrent) {
+ do_failover = 1;
}
- write_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
}
}
@@ -2579,6 +2540,19 @@ static void loadbalance_arp_monitor(stru
if (IS_UP(slave->dev)) {
arp_send_all(slave);
}
+ }
+
+ if (do_failover) {
+ write_lock(&bond->ptrlock);
+
+ reselect_active_interface(bond);
+ if (oldcurrent && !bond->current_slave) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO
+ "%s: now running without any active interface !\n",
+ master->name);
+ }
+
+ write_unlock(&bond->ptrlock);
}
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
--
| Shmulik Hen Advanced Network Services |
| Israel Design Center, Jerusalem |
| LAN Access Division, Platform Networking |
| Intel Communications Group, Intel corp. |
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-08 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-08 14:44 Shmulik Hen [this message]
2003-08-08 22:01 ` [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master's settings to slaves jamal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-09 10:29 Hen, Shmulik
2003-08-11 2:51 ` jamal
2003-08-11 10:08 ` Shmulik Hen
2003-08-11 13:47 ` jamal
2003-08-11 21:41 [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master's settings toslaves Jay Vosburgh
2003-08-11 23:15 ` [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master's settings to slaves Shmulik Hen
2003-08-12 2:36 ` jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308081744.58946.shmulik.hen@intel.com \
--to=shmulik.hen@intel.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.