From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from baldric (baldric.uwo.ca [129.100.10.225]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B54482D for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:23:50 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:21:03 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: John David Anglin Cc: Grant Grundler , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] xfree86 4.2.1-9 build problem Message-ID: <20030811202103.GH20106@systemhalted> References: <20030811190914.GA25311@dsl2.external.hp.com> <200308111925.h7BJPljx020074@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200308111925.h7BJPljx020074@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:25:47PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > What's interesting is the "ld" command has "-lgcc-eh" which is where > > the missing symbols are defined: > > grundler <512>nm libgcc_eh.a | grep _Unwind_SjLj_Resume > > 0000079c T _Unwind_SjLj_Resume > > 000008d0 T _Unwind_SjLj_Resume_or_Rethrow > > grundler <513>pwd > > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3.1 > > Yes, but libgcc_eh.a doesn't contain the versioned symbols that the shared > libraries need. Are we not using libgcc_eh to resolve such symbols in libgcc and libc? c.