From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from baldric (baldric.uwo.ca [129.100.10.225]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891DB482D for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:43:03 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:40:12 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Joel Soete Cc: Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, LaMont Jones Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] itlb miss handler optimizations! Message-ID: <20030812144012.GE9325@systemhalted> References: <20030812035810.GB9325@systemhalted> <3F29178A00002C09@ocpmta7.freegates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3F29178A00002C09@ocpmta7.freegates.net> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > I apply your patch against 2.4.21-pa9 on the N-4000 and compile it successfully > with hppa64-linux-gcc (3.2.3). (having no clue about lmbench) I take this > exercise to roughly compare. > > Running the original 2.4.21-pa9 here are times: > Tue Aug 12 09:59:55 CEST 2003 > [...] # Build kernel: 19'58" > Tue Aug 12 10:19:53 CEST 2003 > [...] # Build modules: 7'46" > Tue Aug 12 10:27:39 CEST 2003 > > Running this new kernel: > > Tue Aug 12 12:28:37 CEST 2003 > [...] # Build kernel: 20'8" > Tue Aug 12 12:48:45 CEST 2003 > [...] # Build modules: 7'47" > Tue Aug 12 12:56:32 CEST 2003 > > The difference are so small that a more accurate tools would be requested. Thanks Joel! Yeah, I figured that perhaps the change might get lost in the noise... I'm still running lmbench multiple times to get good numbers. Thanks again! c.