From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:23:48 -0600 From: Grant Grundler To: Joel Soete Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] itlb miss handler optimizations! Message-ID: <20030814152348.GA17578@dsl2.external.hp.com> References: <20030814114653.GJ10015@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <3F2A5B04000030E1@ocpmta1.freegates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3F2A5B04000030E1@ocpmta1.freegates.net> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:56:42PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote: > In the 2 cases, if a fault occurs an interrupt (6, 15, 16,17 or 20) is > 'triggered'? yes, but most people call them "traps" or "faults" to be more specific. Chapter 5 of the PA 2.0 arch book differentiates nicely. grant