From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: Cpufreq for 2.4: what is the best source? Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 17:41:56 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030815154156.GA1029@brodo.de> References: <3F3CB378.1000607@basmevissen.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F3CB378.1000607@basmevissen.nl> Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bas Mevissen Cc: Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:18:32PM +0200, Bas Mevissen wrote: > > Hi all, > > What is the best source for CPUFREQ for a 2.4.22-rc2 kernels? Is it the > 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 kernel version or the 2.4 tarballs on > ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/cpufreq/ or the LINUX_2_4 tag from CVS? Either 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 or the latest 2.4 backport on www.codemonkey.org.uk - but as that's offline at the moment, I'd try -ac. Or 2.6.0-test3-bk-current :) > Does someone know when codemonkey comes on-line again? Or is there > another place where I can find up to date documentation? IIRC there's zero extra documentation on "codemonkey.org.uk" The best documentation is within the linux kernel sources [2.4.-patched, 2.4-ac, or 2.6.] in Documentation/cpu-freq/ Dominik