From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: Cpufreq for 2.4: what is the best source? Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:39:04 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030815183904.D21529@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <3F3CB378.1000607@basmevissen.nl> <20030815154156.GA1029@brodo.de> <200308151853.30238.g_sauthoff@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308151853.30238.g_sauthoff@web.de>; from g_sauthoff@web.de on Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 06:53:30PM +0200 Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Georg Sauthoff Cc: Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > unfortunely I can't use -ac 2.4. Kernels ... (because of my hardware and not > 2.6. because of a Cisco VPN). Is (or was) www.codemonkey.org.uk really the > only place, to get the cpufreq backports against vanilla 2.4. kernels? > > What about cvs? And the ftp location mentioned by Bas Mevissen is outdated? The ftp is updated each night. Whether it contains anything useful depends on whether people check the changes into the cvs tree(s). If people want a 2.4-ac snapshot and the maintainers are willing to create a cvs branch for them, its pretty simple to add it to nightly scripts. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html