From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Subject: Re: Cpufreq for 2.4: what is the best source?
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:53:57 +0200
Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <20030818175357.GC1570@brodo.de>
References: <3F3CB378.1000607@basmevissen.nl> <20030815154156.GA1029@brodo.de> <3F409E54.20001@basmevissen.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F409E54.20001@basmevissen.nl>
Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Bas Mevissen <ml@basmevissen.nl>
Cc: Bas Mevissen <sgm@basmevissen.nl>, Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 11:37:24AM +0200, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> 
> >
> >Either 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 or the latest 2.4 backport on www.codemonkey.org.uk -
> >but as that's offline at the moment, I'd try -ac. Or 2.6.0-test3-bk-current
> >:)
> >
> 
> Can someone please make a backport of CPUFREQ to 2.4.22-rc2? The -ac has 
>   a new scheduler (backport from 2.6?) and that breaks swsusp for the 
> moment. So I would like to go for 2.4.22-rc2 (or later) with the -ac 
> patches.
> 
> It seems that more people are waiting for a 2.4.22+swsusp+cpufreq, so it 
> is not a waste of time.

Already done. As Dave's site isn't yet back online, it can temporarily be
accessed at
http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq_tmp/cpufreq-2.4.22-rc2-1__.gz

	Dominik