From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 04:58:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from p508B5DEF.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.93.239]:63386 "EHLO dea.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 04:57:58 +0100 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7J3vu8R007619; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 05:57:56 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h7J3vujF007618; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 05:57:56 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 05:57:56 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Thiemo Seufer Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: GCCFLAGS for gcc 3.3.x (-march and _MIPS_ISA) Message-ID: <20030819035756.GC6223@linux-mips.org> References: <20030812.152654.74756131.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20030812065118.GD23104@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030812065118.GD23104@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 3071 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:51:18AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=32 -march=mips2 -mtune=r4600 -Wa,--trap > > (or GCCFLAGS += $(call check_gcc, -mcpu=r4600 -mips2, -mabi=32 -march=mips2 -mtune=r4600) -Wa,--trap) > > > > Isn't it? > > -march=mips2 is an alias for -march=r6000, I don't think that's a > good choice. Why? MIPSII / MIPS32 are the highest ISAs supported for building 32-bit kernels so that makes sense. Ralf