From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:28:34 -0600 From: Grant Grundler To: Joel Soete Cc: Carlos O'Donell , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] linux carlos Message-ID: <20030823192834.GC5072@dsl2.external.hp.com> References: <3F2E2C7700004A24@ocpmta2.freegates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3F2E2C7700004A24@ocpmta2.freegates.net> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:54:26PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > With the patch kernel I also want to launch 3 run test but with -e300 (Just > have a N obviously UP 550Mhz?). Pick whatever parameters are reasonable. The -e100 to -e500 worked well on a dual 1Ghz rx2600 with 3 or 4 GB of RAM. You might try -e50 -> -e250 in steps of 50....at least until the VM address aliasing is fixed and you can run 8-way on the N-class. > The first two run seems to work fine when during the last run I get a lot > of messages "Child caught raw signal ?" and so I could not grab (cut and > past) the first results :( . > > I now relaunch test for only two runs and so hope the results for next week, > sorry. np - thanks. grant