From: "Hime Junior" <hime@engineer.com>
To: "Harald Welte" <laforge@netfilter.org>,
fabrice@netfilter.org, rwagner@cloudnet.com
Cc: "Netfilter Development Mailinglist"
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Merge of iptables 'fuzzy', 'random' and 'nth' match
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:17:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030825131733.54892.qmail@mail.com> (raw)
Dear friends:
I think that "ipt_statistical" is not adequate for a container of the fuzzy match , taking into account that Fuzzy Logic is a branch of the so called Soft Computing or Computational Intelligence , not Statistics .
There is a statistical flavor in the implementation of the fuzzy patch indeed , but only for design reasons - it could be made without any statistical tools .
So , I ask you to keep the decision to include the fuzzy match in the new kernel but as a standalone module - for the best of my knowledge , iptables
is the only "fuzzified" firewall in existence today , and I intend to do additional work to provide more code using FL techniques . I just had no time to do that, but I´m going to ...
Thank you very much !
----- Original Message -----
From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 09:21:58 +0200
To: hime@engineer.com, fabrice@netfilter.org, rwagner@cloudnet.com
Subject: Merge of iptables 'fuzzy', 'random' and 'nth' match
> At the netfilter developer workshop, it was decided that we would like
> to include the functionality of the fuzzy, random and nth match into the
> upcoming 2.6 mainstream kernel.
>
> However, it is doubtful that each of those three features really need
> their own module.
>
> We'd like to ask you to merge the three modules into one
> ipt_statistical.c module, that can be used in 'nth', 'random' or 'fuzzy'
> mode.
>
> If you would work together on this issue (or one of you wants to take up
> this job), I would be very happy to submit the result for kernel
> inclusion.
>
> [btw: the same goes for the IPv6 counterpart - but that 'port' can
> follow later on]
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
> ============================================================================
> "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
> architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
> on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
Hime Junior
___________________________
Electronic and Control Engineer
--
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
CareerBuilder.com has over 400,000 jobs. Be smarter about your job search
http://corp.mail.com/careers
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-25 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-25 13:17 Hime Junior [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-24 7:21 Merge of iptables 'fuzzy', 'random' and 'nth' match Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030825131733.54892.qmail@mail.com \
--to=hime@engineer.com \
--cc=fabrice@netfilter.org \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=rwagner@cloudnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.